Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Advantages and Disadvantages to A Direct Public Offering


Advantages and Disadvantages to a Direct Public Offering

A direct public offering (DPO) is a financial tool that facilitates a company to offer stock directly to investors—without using a broker or underwrite as a mediator—and avoid certain expenses related with "going public" through an initial public offering (IPO). DPO is a form of exempt securities offering, which implies that companies choosing this form of offering are not liable to many of the registration and reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

DPOs first became accessible to small businesses in 1976, but they only attain recognition starting in 1989, when the rules were made simple. The small business initiative program was started by SEC in the year 1992 which eliminated even more hurdles that limited the ability of small companies to raise money by selling stock. In the recent years Internet has enhanced the use of Direct Public offering a lot. In fact, around 200 small companies in the latter half of the 1990s went public via this route, either by directly offering their stock online or through their web sites or by listing with one of the several online DPO forums.

A DPO falls into one of three regulatory classes:

Regulation D: this is the most popular form of DPO; a regulation D also called Small Corporate Offering Registration (SCOR) enables the company to raise up to one million dollars every 12 months. Shares are registered with state’s securities regulatory administration.

Regulation A:  enables a company to raise up to five million dollars annually. However, Reg A DPO mandates registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Small Business Office. This escalates the costs of compliance and reporting, and adds another agency monitoring every 90 days.

Intrastate DPO: there is no upper limit on the amount of the fund which can be raised, but the fund must be raised within the states.

Advantages

A company going for a DPO is adding equity by attracting new shareholders from the public. There are more than one reason why DPO is an increasingly popular alternative for growth oriented micro and small business.
·         A DPO is less costly to the company when compared to an IPO.
·         The regulatory burden in case of DPO under Regulation A is comparatively minimal.
·         The SEC has encouraged the use of the Internet for DPO's.

  Generally when there are high expectations from a company to attract venture capital, then the venture capital firm generally asks for stake and/or substantial amounts of equity. In some cases, the entrepreneur loses control of his or her company and can be removed. The Direct Public Offering is a potential alternative to IPOs and venture capital. DPOs enable the owner of the aggressive companies to raise funds that they need without sacrificing control on their corporations. The costs, which are associated with the DPO, are far more manageable and rational.

     For investors, it is also a smart investment alternative. The investors hardly have access to venture capital investment, and thus they cannot access the rate of returns that those investments can bring. Thus, the DPO method is advantageous for both investors and entrepreneurs.

Disadvantages
The amount of money, which a company can raise through DPO in any 12 month period, is restricted by regulations.

Arriving at a market price is difficult because DPO is not issued and traded publicly like IPOs and thus it may require regular valuations of the company assets, both realized and unrealized.

 Administrative and legal necessities for creating and maintaining a DPO are noteworthy, and divert company resources from expansion initiatives. The costs of creating and staying in compliance with DPO requirements may cost more than the company has to pay for expansion capital.

Meeting state or SEC requirements can be difficult, time-consuming and expensive.
Sufficient funds are hard to raise through DPO.

Any company should ask and take the suggestions of the tax attorney or the chief financial officer about the cost of creating and maintaining a compliant DPO before taking the step and work those numbers over and again to create the best and worst case scenario. This gives any company the better picture of the value of the DPO to business, both for short and long term.

Links Used:

No comments:

Post a Comment